Jonatan Henrriquez-Dubon v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202220-70997California719 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 4 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATAN HENRRIQUEZ-DUBON, No. 20-70997

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-362-686

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 30, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,** District Judge. Dissent by Judge MILLER.

Petitioner Jonatan Henrriquez-Dubon petitions for review of a decision of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and grant the petition.

“Where, as here, the BIA agrees with and incorporates specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.