In re V.P. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2022D079094California4,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/14/22 In re V.P. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

D079094

In re V.P., a Person coming under the Juvenile Law.

L.L. et al., (Super. Ct. No. EFL002713)

Appellants,

v.

S.P.,

Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, William D. Lehman, Judge. Affirmed. John L. Dodd & Associates and John L. Dodd; Marcus Family Law Center, Ethan Marcus and Erin K. Tomlinson, for Appellants. Suzanne M. Davidson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Respondent. This is the second appeal brought by L.L. and H.L. (Grandparents) involving the custody of their grandson, V.P., against V.P.’s father, S.P. (Father). After their petition to terminate Father’s parental rights for having abandoned V.P. was unsuccessful,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.