Nicholas Shoner v. Carrier Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202220-56327California614 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS SHONER, No. 20-56327

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-07030-CAS-E and

PAUL CORMIER, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiff,

v.

CARRIER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: KELLY,** M. SMITH, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Nicholas Shoner appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. Carrier Corporation’s motion to dismiss his putative class action lawsuit.1 Shoner

contends that the district court erred in dismissing his state law warranty claims.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.