Motiur Rahman v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202215-72028California699 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MOTIUR RAHMAN, No. 15-72028
Petitioner, Agency No. A202-098-781
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 12, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Motiur Rahman petitions for review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of an Immigration Judge denying
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture (CAT). We…