Motiur Rahman v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202215-72028California699 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOTIUR RAHMAN, No. 15-72028

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-098-781

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Motiur Rahman petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of an Immigration Judge denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.