Ernesto Cornejo-Arias v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202220-73572California676 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO YOVANY CORNEJO-ARIAS, No. 20-73572

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-062-351

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Ernesto Yovany Cornejo-Arias seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) order denying his applications for withholding of removal and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. deferral of removal pursuant to the Convention Against Torture. We have

jurisdiction over most of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.