Dania Simeon-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202216-72398California354 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIA IZAMAR SIMEON-HERNANDEZ; No. 16-72398 et al., Agency Nos. A206-884-496 Petitioners, A206-884-497

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Dania Izamar Simeon-Hernandez and her minor child, natives and citizens

of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision ordering their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, petitioners’ request for oral argument is denied. removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law and claims of due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.