United States v. Steven Baker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 202221-30236California293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30236

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00087-SPW-

v.

STEVEN WARREN BAKER,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Steven Warren Baker appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Baker contends that the district court erred by categorically rejecting his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). argument that his family circumstances warranted compassionate release. Even if

Baker…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.