Ubaldo Tistoj v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-73243California315 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UBALDO TISTOJ; et al., No. 20-73243

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A203-684-958

A203-684-959

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Ubaldo Tistoj1 and his minor child, natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Although lead petitioner’s name appears as “Ubaldo Tistoj” in the Petition for Review, it appears as “Ubaldo Antonio Tistoj-Vasquez” in the agency decisions, Notice to Appear, and Opening Brief. appeal from an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.