Richard Kong v. Trader Joe's Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-56415California627 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD A. KONG; et al., No. 20-56415

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-05790-PA-JEM v.

TRADER JOE’S COMPANY; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 6, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and McNAMEE,** District Judge.

Plaintiffs Richard Kong, Robert Cruzalegui, Matthew Heiden, and Cashay

Clayborn timely appeal the district court’s dismissal of their amended complaint,

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. Reviewing de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. novo, Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., 899 F.3d 988, 998 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.