Raul Garcia-Lara v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-73300California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL GARCIA-LARA, No. 20-73300

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-014-724

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.

Raul Garcia-Lara petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal and his motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. remand. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

1. We lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.