Prayed
Prayed v. Alaska Railroad Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PRAYED, No. 19-35775
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00036-RRB
and
MEMORANDUM*
FREDERIC T. READY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Prayed appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend.
Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011).
We affirm.