Prayed

Prayed v. Alaska Railroad Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202219-35775California421 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRAYED, No. 19-35775

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00036-RRB

and

MEMORANDUM*

FREDERIC T. READY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Prayed appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend.

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011).

We affirm.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.