Monica Chavez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202216-70438California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MONICA SUSANA CHAVEZ, et al., No. 16-70438

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A202-122-289

A202-122-290

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Monica Susana Chavez and her minor son, natives and citizens of El

Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

application for asylum, and denying Chavez’s application for withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.