Joseph Padgett v. Brian Loventhal
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-15246California457 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH PADGETT, No. 20-15246
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BUSTAMANTE & GAGLIASSO, P.C.,
Movant-Appellee,
A. CURTIS WRIGHT,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
BRIAN LOVENTHAL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 13, 2022** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILER,*** W. FLETCHER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Padgett appeals from the district court’s post-judgment order declining
to compel the clerk of court to enter a renewed judgment in the amount Padgett
requested. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Armstrong…