Joseph Padgett v. Brian Loventhal

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-15246California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH PADGETT, No. 20-15246

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:04-cv-03946-EJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BUSTAMANTE & GAGLIASSO, P.C.,

Movant-Appellee,

A. CURTIS WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

BRIAN LOVENTHAL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 13, 2022** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILER,*** W. FLETCHER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Padgett appeals from the district court’s post-judgment order declining

to compel the clerk of court to enter a renewed judgment in the amount Padgett

requested. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Armstrong…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.