Jose Villeda Miranda v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202220-72637California730 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO VILLEDA MIRANDA, et No. 20-72637 al., Agency Nos. A095-129-475 Petitioners, A208-574-875

A208-574-876

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Jose Antonio Villeda Miranda (“Petitioner Jose Villeda”) and two

of his minor sons (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Honduras,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. seek review of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.