Eder Banegas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 202215-73744California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDER BANEGAS, No. 15-73744

Petitioner, Agency No.

A088-892-539

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, *** District Judge. Eder Banegas (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel previously granted Petitioner’s unopposed motion for submission of this case without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

appeal of a decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.