Sensient Natural Ingredients v. Superior Court CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2022F081949California6,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Filed 4/18/22 Sensient Natural Ingredients v. Superior Court CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SENSIENT NATURAL INGREDIENTS LLC,

F081949

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. CV-19-001906) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS OPINION

COUNTY,

Respondent;

CALVIN AGAR,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Stacy P. Speiller, Judge. Scheppach Bauer, John M. Scheppach and Thorey M. Bauer for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Polaris Law Group, William L. Marder; Diversity Law Group, Larry W. Lee and Max W. Gavron for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- Petitioner Sensient Natural Ingredients LLC (Employer) filed a petition for a writ of mandate (Petition) to challenge the Stanislaus County Superior Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.