Gantman

Gantman v. Stephan, Schreiber & Tabachnick CPA's CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2022B291932California1,539 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/18/22 Gantman v. Stephan, Schreiber & Tabachnick CPA’s CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ANDREW GANTMAN, B291932

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS168144) v.

STEPHAN, SCHREIBER &

TABACHNICK CPA’S, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Edward B. Moreton, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Andrew Gantman, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. DeSimone & Huxster and Gerald DeSimone for Defendant and Respondent. _________________ Labor Code section 98.2, subdivision (a),1 authorizes parties to a Labor Commission wage proceeding to file an appeal to the superior court where the matter is heard de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.