United States v. Ricky Alvarez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202219-10421California369 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10421

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00092-SPL-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICKY PAUL ALVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

The stay of this appeal, entered on July 27, 2021, is lifted.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 We may resolve this appeal without a disposition by the Supreme Court in United States v. Taylor, No. 20-1459, as to whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). See United States v. Goodall, 21 F.4th 555 (9th Cir. 2021) (holding that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.