United States v. Oliver Bibiano-Mayo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202220-50168California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50168

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-mj-23205-FAG-BTM-1 v.

OLIVER BIBIANO-MAYO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Oliver Bibiano-Mayo appeals from the district court’s order affirming his

guilty-plea conviction for attempted illegal entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1325(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bibiano-Mayo contends that his conviction must be vacated because

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1325(a)(1) violates the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.