Raul Medina Herrera v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202216-70975California988 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL MEDINA HERRERA, AKA Mariano No. 16-70975 Lupercio Madrigal, Agency No. A079-748-583 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 14, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,*** Judge.

Petitioner Raul Medina Herrera seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. applications for cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.