Kristhel Castellanos Rojas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202220-71732California500 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTHEL ORESTES CASTELLANOS No. 20-71732 ROJAS; et al., Agency Nos. A201-756-978 Petitioners, A201-756-979

A201-756-980

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Kristhel Orestes Castellanos Rojas, his wife, and their minor son, natives

and citizens of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

denying their applications for asylum, and denying Castellanos Rojas’s and his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). wife’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.