Hugo Hernandez Ceren v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202220-72870California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUGO HERNANDEZ CEREN, AKA Hugo No. 20-72870 Ceren, Agency No. A073-956-722 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: BOGGS,*** HAWKINS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Hugo Hernandez Ceren petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion to reopen and reconsider based on a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. change in the law. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.