Carlos Comer Gordillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202220-73734California849 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS RUBEN COMER GORDILLO, No. 20-73734

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-318-071

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,*** District Judge.

Carlos Ruben Comer Gordillo (Gordillo), a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order that dismissed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for

cancellation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.