Bernabe Perez-Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 202217-70755California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNABE PEREZ-GONZALEZ, AKA No. 17-70755 Carlos Patino-Velez, AKA Bernabe Perez- Gonzale, AKA Bernabe Perez-Gonzales, Agency No. A200-878-219

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 14, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,*** Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Bernabe Perez-Gonzalez petitions for review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.