In re K.B. CA1/2

DISCUSSION

A. Applicable Law and Standard of Review In In re Cesar G. (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1039 (Cesar G.), we recently summarized some of the law pertaining to probation conditions imposed by the juvenile court: “ ‘The juvenile court is authorized to “impose and require any and all reasonable conditions that it may determine fitting and proper to the end that justice may be done and the reformation and rehabilitation of the ward enhanced.” (§ 730, subd. (b).) We review the juvenile court’s probation conditions for abuse of discretion. (In re P.A. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 23, 33.) [¶] Well-established principles guide our review. “ ‘The state, when it asserts jurisdiction over a minor, stands in the shoes of the parents’ [citation], thereby occupying a ‘unique role . . . in caring for the minor’s well being.’ [Citation.] . . . [¶] The permissible scope of discretion in formulating terms of juvenile probation is even greater than that allowed for adults.” ’ ” (Cesar G., supra, 74 Cal.App.5th at p. 1045, quoting In re Edward B. (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 1228, 1232 (Edward B.).) “ ‘The juvenile court’s discretion in imposing conditions of probation is broad but not unlimited. (In…