United States v. Jose Shul-Cruz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-10272California267 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10272

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cr-00391-GMS-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSE ANTONIO SHUL-CRUZ, AKA Jose Antonio Shul,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jose Antonio Shul-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry of a

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Shul-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grounds for relief, along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.