United States v. Johnnie Warren

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-10325California404 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10325

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:91-cr-00118-DAE-

v.

JOHNNIE T. WARREN, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii David Alan Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Johnnie T. Warren appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and motion

for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, see United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we affirm.

Warren…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.