Timothy Wilkins v. Correctional Officers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-56321California272 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

APR 19 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS, No. 21-56321

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-03383-VAP-E

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Timothy Deanore Wilkins appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his

U.S.C § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims related to cell searches

and contamination of personal property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.