Taek Yoon v. Lee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202220-56248California329 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

APR 19 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TAEK SANG YOON, No. 20-56248

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-06792-VAP-KK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LEE, Physician CRC; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DURANT, Librarian CRC, PINECO, CRC Correctional Officer, individual capacity,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Taek Sang Yoon appeals pro se from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

prosecute or comply with court orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.