Peter Kleidman v. Thomas Willhite

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202220-56256California678 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETER KLEIDMAN, No. 20-56256

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02365-PSG-JDE

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL FOR

THE SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT;

TANI GORRE CANTIL-SAKAUYE; MING

W. CHIN; AUDREY B. COLLINS; CAROL

A. CORRIGAN; MARIANO-

FLORENTINO CUELLAR; DIVISION

FOUR OF THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF

APPEAL FOR THE SECOND APPELLATE

DISTRICT; DOES; NORMAL L. EPSTEIN;

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA;

LEONDRA R. KRUGER; GOODWIN H.

LIU; SUPREME COURT OF

CALIFORNIA; KATHRYN M.

WERDEGAR; THOMAS L. WILLHITE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Peter Kleidman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.