Nicholas Scoyni v. Central Valley Fund L.P.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-35011California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS D. SCOYNI, No. 21-35011

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00402-SEH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CENTRAL VALLEY FUND L.P. II & III;

MB FINANCIAL BANK; CVF CAPITAL

PARTNERS; FIFTH THIRD BANCORP;

CENTRAL VALLEY FUND L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Nicholas D. Scoyni appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Axiom Foods, Inc. v. Acerchem

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Int’l, Inc., 874 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir. 2017)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.