Jose Mejia v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-16550California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MEJIA, No. 21-16550

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-01351-HSG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jose Mejia appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

diversity action alleging state law breach of contract and negligence claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

failure to state claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (12)(b)(6). Cervantes

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. United States, 330 F.3d 1186,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.