Jose Mejia v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-16550California271 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE MEJIA, No. 21-16550
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-01351-HSG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Jose Mejia appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his
diversity action alleging state law breach of contract and negligence claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for
failure to state claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (12)(b)(6). Cervantes
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. United States, 330 F.3d 1186,…