James Williams v. Metropolitan Water District
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-15908California324 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES LEE WILLIAMS, No. 21-15908
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00030-DWL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
James Lee Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). Axiom Foods,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Inc. v. Acerchem Int’l, Inc., 874 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th…