James Williams v. Metropolitan Water District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 202221-15908California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES LEE WILLIAMS, No. 21-15908

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00030-DWL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

James Lee Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). Axiom Foods,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Inc. v. Acerchem Int’l, Inc., 874 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.