People v. Gonzalez CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 2022H046836California29,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danner, J.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History In March 2015, the grand jury of Santa Clara County returned a 34-count indictment charging appellant Gonzalez, codefendant Carlos Roman, and 22 other individuals.1 In December 2017, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a third amended indictment (hereafter indictment) against the same 24 people. That indictment alleged 14 crimes against Gonzalez: Street terrorism (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (a)2; count 1), attempted murder (§§ 187, 664, subd. (a); count 5), assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count 6), dissuading a witness or victim by force or threat (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1); counts 7 & 8), robbery (§ 211; count 9), burglary (§ 460, subd. (a); count 10), criminal threats (§ 422; count 11), conspiracy to sell methamphetamine (§ 182, subd. (a)(1); Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a); count 12), conspiracy to sell marijuana (§ 182, subd. (a)(1); Health & Saf. Code, § 11360, subd. (a); count 13), conspiracy to bring contraband into a custodial facility (§§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4573; count 14), possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code § 11378; count 15), and illegal possession of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.