People v. Raynoha CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 2022D078748California980 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The change of plea contains the admissions made by Raynoha, which served as the factual basis for the plea. Respondent has accurately

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 summarized the facts from that testimony. We will incorporate that summary here.

The oral factual basis for Raynoha’s guilty plea2 was as follows: Raynoha planned with James Torkelson, Max Anderson, and Jeffrey Young to commit a robbery at the Five Star Shuttle & Fly. On the evening of July 17, 1999, Anderson drove his truck with Raynoha, Torkelson, and Young riding as passengers to conduct reconnaissance and execute the robbery. On the morning of July 18, 1999, Raynoha was armed with a 9- millimeter gun to commit the robbery. Anderson had two 9-millimeter guns and Young a .38 caliber weapon. The three men followed Torkelson and met at the parking lot. Raynoha, Anderson, and Young laid down in the back of Torkelson’s Toyota 4-Runner as Torkelson drove into the parking lot. As instructed by Torkelson, Raynoha was armed as he encountered the security guard and took him down to the ground while Anderson and Young entered the office trailer to take money from the safe.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.