Yongri Bian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202216-70546California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YONGRI BIAN, No. 16-70546

Petitioner, Agency No. A088-114-133

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 15, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and GONZALEZ ROGERS,*** District Judge.

Yongri Bian (“Bian”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of

China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the “BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse credibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.