United States v. James Jackson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202221-30208California321 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30208
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00170-MO-
v.
JAMES ALBERT JACKSON, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
James Albert Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying
his second motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
following this court’s remand. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jackson asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion because it
failed to consider…