Thomas Foster v. Christine Wormuth
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202221-35606California333 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS WILLIAM FOSTER, No. 21-35606
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05041-RJB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Department of the Army,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Thomas William Foster appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his Title VII employment action alleging discrimination and retaliation.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion a dismissal for failure to serve the summons and complaint under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).…