Haley Daria v. Sapient Corp.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202221-16480California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HALEY DARIA, No. 21-16480

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-02712-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SAPIENT CORP., acquirer of intellectual properties of World Wide Web Associates, a CA LLC; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Haley Daria appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her

action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Daria’s request for oral argument, set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.