Charles Yeager v. Airbus Group Se

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202221-55162California2,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 20 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES E. YEAGER, “Chuck” (Ret.); No. 21-55162

GENERAL CHUCK YEAGER, INC.,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 8:19-cv-01793-JLS-ADS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AIRBUS GROUP SE; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

CHARLES E. YEAGER, “Chuck” (Ret.); No. 21-55776

GENERAL CHUCK YEAGER, INC.,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 8:19-cv-01793-JLS-ADS

v.

AIRBUS GROUP SE; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Argued and Submitted April 4, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The Estate of General Charles E. Yeager (“General Yeager”)1 and the

private corporate entity that owns the federal trademark on his name, General

Charles Yeager, Inc., (collectively, “Yeager”) appeal the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.