Alfonso Garcia v. David Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 202221-15995California363 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFONSO GARCIA, No. 21-15995

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00048-SPL-MTM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC Director;

CENTURION MANAGED CARE,

Corporate Office; S. WRIGHT, NP,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Alfonso Garcia appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an Eighth Amendment

claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.