Jose Tzompantzi-Salazar v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202220-71514California5,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

VanDyke, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE TZOMPANTZI-SALAZAR, No. 20-71514 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-196-389

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. AMENDED

OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2021 * Pasadena, California

Filed February 9, 2022 Amended April 21, 2022

Before: Ryan D. Nelson and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Karen E. Schreier, ** District Judge.

Order; Opinion by Judge VanDyke

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. TZOMPANTZI-SALAZAR V. GARLAND

SUMMARY ***

Immigration

The panel filed an order (1) amending the opinion filed on February 9, 2022; and (2) stating that no further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc would be entertained. In the amended opinion, the panel denied Jose Tzompantzi-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.