Proulx

Proulx v. Neal CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 2022B309328California2,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 4/21/22 Proulx v. Neal CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

STEPHEN PROULX, 2d Civil No. B309328 (Super. Ct. No. 17FL01788) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

ANDREA NEAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant Andrea Neal and respondent Stephen Proulx1 divorced in 2018. Their judgment of dissolution provided for joint physical and legal custody of their son. A dispute arose over where they would enroll him in kindergarten for the 2020-2021 academic year. Proulx requested an order from the trial court selecting a school near his house in Goleta; Neal requested a school near her house in Ojai. Both presented modified custody schedules attempting to split custodial time fairly. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.