C.S.
C.S. v. R.M. CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/21/22 C.S. v. R.M. CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Nevada) ----
C.S., C092281 & C092300
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CU20084574 & CU20084575) v.
R.M.,
Defendant and Appellant.
J.M.,
Defendant and Appellant.
The primary issue in this case is the intersection of the civil harassment statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6,1 and the anti-SLAPP statute, section 425.16.
Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. 2 “Anti-SLAPP” refers to the procedural vehicle provided by section 425.16 to strike legal actions intended as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation.” (Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53,…