Samuel Medina-Cavizuela v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202217-72879California1,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL MEDINACAVIZUELA, No. 17-72879

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-714-741

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,*** District Judge.

Samuel Medina Cavizuela, a Mexican citizen, timely petitions to reverse the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision to uphold an immigration judge’s denial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. of Medina Cavizuela’s application for withholding of removal and protection

under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.