James Barrow v. Newrez LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202221-15626California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES BARROW; GEORGE A TACKER, No. 21-15626

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08064-SMB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NEWREZ LLC, DBA Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing; MORTGAGE LAW FIRM PC, an Arizona Corporation; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, a foreign Limited Liability Company;

NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022**

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

James Barrow and George A. Tacker appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising out

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.