Jaime Centeno v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202221-71031California735 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 21 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME CENTENO, No. 21-71031

Petitioner, Agency No. A036-907-798

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 15, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,** District Judge.

Jamie Centeno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision summarily affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of deferral of removal under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and

deny the petition.

1. In order to be eligible for relief under the CAT, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.