Daniel Manriquez v. J. Vangilder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202221-15403California1,588 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, No. 21-15403
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-01320-HSG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. VANGILDER; J. VASQUEZ,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
S. CUPP; J. CUSKE; K. OHLAND; D.
MELTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Defendants-Appellants Justin Vangilder and Juan Vasquez appeal from the
district court’s order awarding Plaintiff-Appellee Daniel Manriquez $259,237.50 in
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. attorneys’ fees under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “We review an award of attorney’s fees for an
abuse of discretion.” Fischer v. SJB-P.D. Inc., 214 F.3d…