Daniel Manriquez v. J. Vangilder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202221-15403California1,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL MANRIQUEZ, No. 21-15403

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-01320-HSG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

J. VANGILDER; J. VASQUEZ,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

S. CUPP; J. CUSKE; K. OHLAND; D.

MELTON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Defendants-Appellants Justin Vangilder and Juan Vasquez appeal from the

district court’s order awarding Plaintiff-Appellee Daniel Manriquez $259,237.50 in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. attorneys’ fees under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “We review an award of attorney’s fees for an

abuse of discretion.” Fischer v. SJB-P.D. Inc., 214 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.