Arthur Ezor v. Jim McDonnell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 202221-55117California493 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A. EDWARD EZOR, No. 21-55117
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-08851-JVS-AGR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JIM McDONNELL; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
JAMES V. SELNA; ALICIA G.
ROSENBERG,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2022**
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
A. Edward Ezor appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Engebretson v.
Mahoney, 724 F.3d 1034, 1037 (9th Cir. 2013) (dismissal on the basis…