Ted Amparan v. M. Spearman
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 22 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TED AMPARAN, No. 20-55711
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-02522-BTM-WVG v.
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 6, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and McNAMEE,*** District Judge.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Petitioner Ted Amparan appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for
writ of habeas corpus under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act,